|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |
Vimsy Vortis
Shoulda Checked Local
Break-A-Wish Foundation
4451
   |
Posted - 2016.10.09 09:43:49 -
[1] - Quote
Removing gameplay doesn't improve the game. |
Vimsy Vortis
Shoulda Checked Local
Break-A-Wish Foundation
4452
|
Posted - 2016.10.09 09:50:53 -
[2] - Quote
Jedi Xenogen wrote:Its detrimental and a useless part of the game, your statement is general and not helpful at all.
If it was useless people would not be using it and you would not be complaining about it being used.
Your argument is contradicting itself. |
Vimsy Vortis
Shoulda Checked Local
Break-A-Wish Foundation
4452
|
Posted - 2016.10.09 10:06:38 -
[3] - Quote
Jedi Xenogen wrote:I can understand pvp in null because there is territory to capture and defend and thats great, its fun, there is ZERO fun in highsec pvp in my experience and I'm sure ALOT of people agree.
I imagine the people actually doing the highsec PVP disagree, otherwise they wouldn't be doing it. |
Vimsy Vortis
Shoulda Checked Local
Break-A-Wish Foundation
4459
|
Posted - 2016.10.09 12:12:33 -
[4] - Quote
Mark Marconi wrote:The biggest problem with hi-sec wardecs is that they are not risk vs reward.
They cost more the larger the corp you are war decing. So it is the opposite of risk vs reward.
A large corp deccing a smaller corp and taking less risk pays less.
The fees should be based on the size of your corp vs what you are war decing.
Have a base and then a multiplier effect so if you have 50 in your corp and want to wardec a 10 character corp you pay 5 times as much but if you are in a 10 character corp and want to wardec a 5000 character alliance, its almost free, as you are going to die a lot.
You'll be happy to know that we did a wardec round table thing yesterday and everyone there universally agreed that the current cost scale system is logically unsound, unfairly benefits large groups which don't need extra protection from CONCORD and that a system in which the size of the aggressor is what determines the cost of declaring war, no the size of the defender would be preferable.
Literally everyone agreed that this would be a more fair, more reasonable way for the system to work, even people who whose alliances would be negatively affected by it.
Nobody, be they are carebear miner or a highsec mercenary thinks that it costing more to declare war on a larger group is okay. |
|
|
| |
|